propose today, without comment, an excellent article by Massimo De Manzoni
pm According to the jeweler that has defended too
Di Massimo De Manzoni
Il Giornale, April 29, 2009 (http://www.ilgiornale.it/a.pic1?ID=347534&START=0&2col =)
Di Massimo De Manzoni
Il Giornale, April 29, 2009 (http://www.ilgiornale.it/a.pic1?ID=347534&START=0&2col =)
Then say so. Explain to everyone that in Italy there is a legitimate defense, abolished by the magistrates office. So at least we know, we put the heart at rest and not think about it anymore. Yes, because even if Remigio Radolli finisce indagato, significa che in questo Paese difendersi dai banditi, senon è ancora vietato, è quanto meno fortemente sconsigliato. Per capirci, Remigio Radolli è quel gioielliere di Cinisello Balsamo, nel Milanese, che il 16 aprile scorso reagì a una selvaggia aggressione a scopo di rapina sparando tre colpi di pistola che ferirono (non uccisero: ferirono) uno dei malviventi.
Forse lo ricorderete: le foto del volto devastato e sanguinante di quest’omone di 59 anni finirono sulle prime pagine di tutti i giornali. O meglio, di tutti meno tre: il Manifesto e Liberazione decisero di non dare neppure la notizia; l’Unità scelse di non pubblicare l’immagine: troppo pericolosa, parlava più di mille articles and was not functional and implicit condemnation of the automatic-gun-shop owners. And then, the robbers had been at least children of Italian boys from good families. Not at all, were Albanians. And what's more illegal immigrants. So, a piece on page 14 (with the center-attack ritual "that speculates on people's fears") and then off to new and exciting adventures. It is not known whether the prosecutor who registered Remigio Radolli under investigation for misuse of legitimate defense, Dr. Stefan Tullius, is a reader of one of these three newspapers. Maybe not, maybe they abhor. But it is certain that the Italian judiciary, cosìcomenellasinistra, ilconcetto that a person has the right to defend themselves, their loved ones and their property is a damned hard to find citizenship.
In this case, the jeweler does not have chased the robbers out of the shop to shoot their
back. Nor has it signed with them a challenge, making it the fastest (which, however, a weapon in front of the esplanade, we feel perfectly lawful). No, first to fire, has agreed to slaughter. The young Albanian, Blerim Mani, 25, has repeatedly hit in the head, face and chest with the gun he brandished.
"An unprecedented level of violence", as the police wrote in their report, which has left an eye-catching: 18 stitches, an eye tumefatto, uno zigomo fratturato, un paio di costole incrinate. Solo dopo (dopo) aver subito tutto questo, il commerciante è riuscito a mettere le mani sulla sua calibro 22, regolarmente denunciata, e a salvarsi la pelle. Se non è legittima difesa questa! E invece no: ha ecceduto, va indagato. Perché?
Dice: ma il povero albanese aveva una scacciacani e Radolli colleziona armi, è un esperto, doveva rendersi conto che lapistola del bandito era finta. Certo, semplicissimo. Vi stanno rovinando di botte e voi vi concentrate sulla canna della sputafuoco: «Ma guarda te, questa non è una vera Smith &Wesson. No, no: la zigrinatura è diversa. Beh, allora...». Allora, tranquilli. E che importa se quell’«arma toy ', as defined by the kindly unit is used as a hammer to his head split in two.
And what is the problem in a moment if the wielder of the store will open the door to an accomplice who has been out and is eager to lead a little 'hands, too. Surreal? Maybe. Anyway, we investigated if in doubt. Dear you, it seems self-defense, but it might be too much: go with the 'notice, go with the brand. "A legal obligation," they hasten to explain. Sure. "It's to protect the jeweler," they add. And needless to say? Moreover you also do not guarantee you will feel better once your name is entered in the register of mythical investigated? Well, yes, there is the hassle of your reputation, but in return you are protected.
Oh yes, and then that little thing that you should get yourself a lawyer. And pay for it, because you good people. Never mind, no? And in the meantime, if you bother to stop you from working? No, because of course the jewelry is seized: you are a suspect, by God, not an ordinary citizen. Unbelievable? Unfortunately, no, things are exactly like that. This is despite the law, properly amended by Parliament in February 2006,
during the previous Berlusconi government, determines that it is not punishable who use "a weapon legally owned order to protect their safety and property ol'altrui proprioaltrui, quandovi is danger of aggression. " A
Cinisello Balsamo there was no "danger of aggression." There was an assault so brutal that the controller is charged with attempted murder. Radolli It is quite simply what was about to be killed, the injured party as suggested by the lawyers, and only in that capacity should enter the process. Instead he is under investigation. And the courts will tell the story better that you could not do otherwise, that the law does not allow another means of making certain findings, which they do not have guilt and that if anything should change the code. Until find a judge who comes from the chorus and, as is Maurizio Laudi interviewed in these pages, says Chenon not true. That there's nothing really to change if you Dont head of a colleague. Thank you, Attorney. That the king was naked, people who use a little 'common sense had suspected, so to speak. Now he knows that it was not a hallucination.
Forse lo ricorderete: le foto del volto devastato e sanguinante di quest’omone di 59 anni finirono sulle prime pagine di tutti i giornali. O meglio, di tutti meno tre: il Manifesto e Liberazione decisero di non dare neppure la notizia; l’Unità scelse di non pubblicare l’immagine: troppo pericolosa, parlava più di mille articles and was not functional and implicit condemnation of the automatic-gun-shop owners. And then, the robbers had been at least children of Italian boys from good families. Not at all, were Albanians. And what's more illegal immigrants. So, a piece on page 14 (with the center-attack ritual "that speculates on people's fears") and then off to new and exciting adventures. It is not known whether the prosecutor who registered Remigio Radolli under investigation for misuse of legitimate defense, Dr. Stefan Tullius, is a reader of one of these three newspapers. Maybe not, maybe they abhor. But it is certain that the Italian judiciary, cosìcomenellasinistra, ilconcetto that a person has the right to defend themselves, their loved ones and their property is a damned hard to find citizenship.
In this case, the jeweler does not have chased the robbers out of the shop to shoot their
back. Nor has it signed with them a challenge, making it the fastest (which, however, a weapon in front of the esplanade, we feel perfectly lawful). No, first to fire, has agreed to slaughter. The young Albanian, Blerim Mani, 25, has repeatedly hit in the head, face and chest with the gun he brandished. "An unprecedented level of violence", as the police wrote in their report, which has left an eye-catching: 18 stitches, an eye tumefatto, uno zigomo fratturato, un paio di costole incrinate. Solo dopo (dopo) aver subito tutto questo, il commerciante è riuscito a mettere le mani sulla sua calibro 22, regolarmente denunciata, e a salvarsi la pelle. Se non è legittima difesa questa! E invece no: ha ecceduto, va indagato. Perché?
Dice: ma il povero albanese aveva una scacciacani e Radolli colleziona armi, è un esperto, doveva rendersi conto che lapistola del bandito era finta. Certo, semplicissimo. Vi stanno rovinando di botte e voi vi concentrate sulla canna della sputafuoco: «Ma guarda te, questa non è una vera Smith &Wesson. No, no: la zigrinatura è diversa. Beh, allora...». Allora, tranquilli. E che importa se quell’«arma toy ', as defined by the kindly unit is used as a hammer to his head split in two.
And what is the problem in a moment if the wielder of the store will open the door to an accomplice who has been out and is eager to lead a little 'hands, too. Surreal? Maybe. Anyway, we investigated if in doubt. Dear you, it seems self-defense, but it might be too much: go with the 'notice, go with the brand. "A legal obligation," they hasten to explain. Sure. "It's to protect the jeweler," they add. And needless to say? Moreover you also do not guarantee you will feel better once your name is entered in the register of mythical investigated? Well, yes, there is the hassle of your reputation, but in return you are protected.
Oh yes, and then that little thing that you should get yourself a lawyer. And pay for it, because you good people. Never mind, no? And in the meantime, if you bother to stop you from working? No, because of course the jewelry is seized: you are a suspect, by God, not an ordinary citizen. Unbelievable? Unfortunately, no, things are exactly like that. This is despite the law, properly amended by Parliament in February 2006,
during the previous Berlusconi government, determines that it is not punishable who use "a weapon legally owned order to protect their safety and property ol'altrui proprioaltrui, quandovi is danger of aggression. " A Cinisello Balsamo there was no "danger of aggression." There was an assault so brutal that the controller is charged with attempted murder. Radolli It is quite simply what was about to be killed, the injured party as suggested by the lawyers, and only in that capacity should enter the process. Instead he is under investigation. And the courts will tell the story better that you could not do otherwise, that the law does not allow another means of making certain findings, which they do not have guilt and that if anything should change the code. Until find a judge who comes from the chorus and, as is Maurizio Laudi interviewed in these pages, says Chenon not true. That there's nothing really to change if you Dont head of a colleague. Thank you, Attorney. That the king was naked, people who use a little 'common sense had suspected, so to speak. Now he knows that it was not a hallucination.
0 comments:
Post a Comment